Deconstruction of a Salesman
The deconstructive lens in
literature focuses on contrast, and whether it is between characters or ideas, Death of a Salesman is rife with
contrast. From the beginning of the work, there is clear contrast between many
of the characters found on stage, especially between Bernard and Biff. The
comparison between Biff and Bernard is especially interesting due to the way
that it develops over time. In the very first flashback, Willy says, “Bernard
can get the best marks in school, y’understand, but when he gets out in the
business world, y’understand, you are going to be five times ahead of him”
(Miller 20). Willy contrasts how Bernard and Biff are acting in their youth as
Bernard is not well liked and just follows Biff around, while Biff is on top of
the high school world but disregards his studies. This is proven to come back
and bite him in the end, as he ends up unable to hold down a job while Bernard
ends up arguing a case in front of the Supreme Court because he has been raised
to work hard. This contrast is very influential to the story, as the driving
force of the play relies on how Biff turned out as an adult and the things that
caused him to be the way that he is.
Another contrast that defines
the work is the differences between ideas/expectations and their execution. The
differences between how characters think things will play out and how they
actually occur is an essential contrast. This is very apparent in Willy’s
general attitude towards life, and as Happy puts it, “Dad is never so happy as
when he is looking forward to something!” (Miller 75). Contrast can be seen
here between what Willy is always thinking that he will get out of certain
situations as opposed to what actually comes out of these situations. He is
always excited before things happen, but disappointed once he gets what he
wants. This points to some striking commentary on the American dream, and how
it very much is just a dream. People who dream big are often not satisfied with
their results. The conflict surrounding the American dream is further
perpetuated by Biff when he ponders, “Why am I trying to become what I don’t
want to be?” (Miller 97). Biff, like many others, has attempted to force
himself down the expected path, while simultaneously really wanting to go
elsewhere and follow his heart. The same expectation versus reality contrast is
evident here, as the dream of a traditional path is supposed to bring happiness
and fulfillment, but for Biff it brings neither. In conclusion, Death of a Salesman is a narrative that
is built heavily on the contrasts it contains, and these serve to develop both
the characters and the plot.
The contrast you identified between Bernard and Biff is a strong argument. I would focus more on being skeptic and how the contrasts lead to skepticism in the work as a whole.
ReplyDeleteGreat identification of contrasts--note that the deconstructionist lens seeks to exploit the gaps in a narrative (whether intentional or often unintentional by the author). In Miller's case the gaps seem intentional--thus your argument that the gaps between image and reality/pursuit and passion lead to Miller's point that the best goals in life are not always the ones we are pursuing. (Note that your conclusion ought to focus on MOWAW like your few previous sentences do, rather than backing off the big point in favor of "developing plot." Thanks.
ReplyDelete